The Potential Governing Structural Reformative Solution in the Context of the Nepalese Crisis

The economic, financial, social, and political indicators of Nepal have been moving very negatively through sensitively difficult situations and at the level of crisis. If no intervention is taken for the improvement of these indicators on time, it is going to reach the level of severe crisis. Anyway, at this state, we have various reformative interventions as per their respective gravity and dimension based on the “Electoral and Governing Structural Reformative Approach (EaGSRA)” and the “Good Governance and Specialized Interventional Initiative Approach (GGaSIIA)”. The EaGSRA offers various reformative approaches and corresponding governing structural interventions ranging from the Normal Reformative Approach to the Radical Reformative Approach and their respective interventions. To which should one adhere? It depends on the government and their choice of interest. Whereas the GGaSIIA offers a variety of interventional initiatives to address the current political and economic crisis by addressing the Nepalese people’s and Gen Z Group’s anti-corruption and political movement in order to further move towards the country’s journey of peace, prosperity, and sustainability. Comprehensive Economic and Financial Revitalization, Reformation, Recovery and Development Initiative (CEaFRRRaDI); Zero Tolerance Policy Against Corruption and Impunity (ZTPACaI); Justiciable Tax/Specific-Tax-Cuts/Return/Reduction; Approach of Political Volunteerism (AoPV) in most of the introductory political roles; Promotional Public Fund for Start-up and Entrepreneur (PPFfSaE); Employment, Production, Industry and Market Protection, Promotion and Development Initiative (EPIaMPPaDI); Comprehensive Banking, Finance, and Cooperative Crisis Management Initiative (CBFaCCMI); House Decision for Decidable Issues (HDfDIs) and Referendum for House Undecidable Issues (RfHUIs); Special Independent Judicial Investigation Commission (SIJIC) for identification and judicial settlement of mass killings of Gen Zs; Loss Evaluation and National Infrastructural Reconstruction Fund, Commission, and corresponding Rapid Taskforce; and Government Work Efficiency, Anti-Corruption, Money Laundering Special Undercover Task Team Initiative (GWEAMLSUTTI); etc. are some examples of GGaSILA. Anyway, with these findings, a new, innovative, broader multidisciplinary and dynamics Crisis Assessment and Analysis Model has been offered on the one hand, and, on the other, it has also presented a new and innovative Reformation Theory and Model of Electoral Constituency Delimitation and Governance Structure as an innovation and important achievement of this research efforts.